Designer profile

Cini Boeri: changing how much space a chair seems to take

Bobo looks like a comfortable piece cut from a larger mass. Ghost almost disappears into the room. Cini Boeri worked on both: a solid foam seat and, with Tomu Katayanagi, a chair made from curved glass. Their connection is the space they give to the person and the space they seem to occupy around them.

Cini Boeri, holding a glass near the left of the photograph, smiles at a gathering with Gio Ponti in Milan.
Cini Boeri holding a glass at a Milan gathering with Gio Ponti, 1954. Unknown photographer, via Wikimedia Commons. Public domain.
On this page
Key facts & takeaways

At a glance

Subject
Cini Boeri
Entry
Designer profile
Last reviewed
11 September 2026

Three things to remember

  1. Bobo’s foam body does not need a rigid internal frame.
  2. Ghost is a glass chair jointly designed with Tomu Katayanagi.
  3. Transparency changes visual presence without removing physical structure.

Start with the space around it

A chair occupies a room twice. Its body takes up actual floor space, and its outline takes up space in our view. Those two things need not feel equally substantial.

Boeri’s furniture rewards looking at both. An upholstered volume can be generous without needing a separate wooden skeleton. A transparent object can retain a full seat and back while allowing the wall, floor and neighbouring furniture to remain visible. The question is how an object participates in an inhabited space, rather than whether it belongs to a recognisable matching style.

Her work as an architect made the relationship between people and their surroundings an everyday concern. Arflex’s account of Bobo connects her design approach with function and the psychological experience of domestic space.1

A seat without the hidden frame

Designed in 1967, Bobo uses a single body of polyurethane foam. There is no rigid internal structure around which separate upholstery has to be built. The shape itself becomes the seat.

That construction changes what we see. A conventional armchair often announces legs, arms, cushions and back as separate parts. Bobo reads as a continuous upholstered mass. Its rounded profile feels closer to a shaped landscape than to a timber frame dressed in fabric.

This apparent simplicity still depends on decisions about material, proportion and support. Removing a frame does not remove design work. It relocates that work into the foam body and the relationship between its different surfaces.1

The chair you can see through

Ghost, developed with Tomu Katayanagi for FIAM in 1987, takes a different route. Its glass surface bends into the places normally occupied by a chair’s back, seat and arms. Reflections and edges reveal the shape; much of the room remains visible through it.

The Quirinale’s collection account describes this tension between occupying space and appearing insubstantial. It is a helpful way to look at the chair: follow an edge, then look through the surface it bounds.2

Making the form required collaboration with glass specialists. FIAM’s account preserves both designers’ names and the role of founder Vittorio Livi in developing the project. The chair’s light appearance is inseparable from demanding work with a heavy, resistant material.3

A solid chair silhouette hides lines behind it, while an outlined chair leaves the same lines visible.
Original PatinaHall schematic, not to scale: the eye can pass through a transparent object while its physical volume remains. The comparison is conceptual.

Two ways to make room

Put the two ideas beside each other and the contrast becomes productive. Bobo gathers the seat into one soft volume. Ghost lets the eye pass through an equally definite object.

Neither solution makes the room irrelevant. The foam body establishes a strong place to settle; the glass chair draws the surrounding space into its appearance. Boeri’s work encourages us to look beyond the outline of a chair and notice the conversation it has with everything around it.

Research notesEvidence, connections and limits

Bobo dates to 1967 and Ghost to 1987. The Quirinale’s 2019 installation of Ghost is a later event. The comparison diagram explains visual presence and does not describe either chair’s measured engineering.

Evidence map

Connected subjects and evidence

Reviewed connections

  • Bobodesigned byCini Boeridocumented

    Maker dates the one-piece polyurethane seating design to 1967.

    Reviewed 11 September 2026 by PatinaHall editorial.
  • Ghost chairdesigned byCini Boeridocumented

    Joint design with Tomu Katayanagi, developed with FIAM.

    Reviewed 11 September 2026 by PatinaHall editorial.
  • Cini Boericollaborated withTomu Katayanagidocumented

    Co-designers of Ghost; collaboration does not extend to every Boeri project.

    Reviewed 11 September 2026 by PatinaHall editorial.

Research trail

Sources and further reading

  1. Bobo, Cini Boeri, 1967ArflexAccessed 11 September 2026
  2. GhostQuirinale ContemporaneoAccessed 11 September 2026
  3. Ghost: Compasso d’Oro alla carriera, 2022FIAM ItaliaAccessed 11 September 2026
  4. Cini Boeri — image recordUnknown photographer / Wikimedia CommonsAccessed 11 September 2026

Last reviewed 11 September 2026. Found an error or a stronger primary source? Contact PatinaHall.