Design story

Sitzmaschine: a machine with nothing to hide

The row of knobs behind the arms of Sitzmaschine is a useful place to begin. Those repeated forms help set the angle of the back. Josef Hoffmann gave the chair a name suggesting machinery, but the adjustment remains visible and understandable. You can read the possibility of reclining in the parts themselves.

At left, a bentwood armchair has an adjustable back, round support knobs and a low open seat; another chair stands to its right.
Josef Hoffmann’s adjustable Model 670, at left, made by Jacob & Josef Kohn, circa 1904–1906. Photographed at the Museum für Angewandte Kunst Köln by Daderot in 2015, via Wikimedia Commons; CC0. This is the Cologne example, distinct from the MoMA and Leopold Museum records discussed in the article.
On this page
Key facts & takeaways

At a glance

Subject
Sitzmaschine, model 670
Entry
Design story
Last reviewed
11 September 2026

Three things to remember

  1. The repeated knobs belong to the adjustment as well as the outline.
  2. Curved frame members and flat panels produce different kinds of shape.
  3. Surviving versions, cushions and museum models should not be treated as identical.

The back tells you that it can move

Some reclining chairs hide their adjustment inside a thick upholstered body. Sitzmaschine lets the eye find the relationship between back, support and a sequence of possible positions.

MoMA’s account identifies the rows of knobs as part of the backrest adjustment. The chair was designed around 1905 for the Purkersdorf Sanatorium, within Hoffmann’s wider effort to coordinate a building and its furnishings.1

The visible repetition is doing two things. It gives the object a recognisable rhythm, and it indicates that the back need not remain at one angle. A mechanical possibility becomes part of the way the chair is read from the side.

A chair’s back pivots backwards towards a row of possible support positions.
Original PatinaHall schematic, not to scale: a change of support position permits a change in back angle. The diagram simplifies the idea of adjustment; it is not a working mechanism or a measured Model 670 section.

A curved line meets a flat panel

The frame’s loops turn the arms and lower supports into a continuous-looking route. Against those curves, the broad panels of the seat and back provide flatter surfaces. The contrast keeps the assembly legible.

The Leopold Museum records bent beech, plywood panels, a metal bar and screws in its example. Its account also describes an extending foot board and a newspaper compartment beneath the seat. Resting was imagined as an activity with equipment and small conveniences around it.2

Follow the frame from an arm towards the floor. Then look at the flatter back between the loops. The chair combines different ways of forming wood instead of asking every part to behave alike.

The machine could have cushions

The name and exposed construction can make Sitzmaschine seem committed to hardness. MoMA’s history supplies a useful correction: Jacob & Josef Kohn made several versions, most with cushions on the seat and back.1

That changes the imagined encounter. An unupholstered museum view reveals the structure clearly, but it need not represent every historical experience of sitting in the design.

The visible mechanism and the soft layer are capable of coexisting. One organises position; the other changes the contact between chair and body. The machine-like character belongs to the clarity of the arrangement, not necessarily to the absence of padding.

A small model tests a different kind of looking

The MAK collection includes a miniature Sitzmaschine model. Its dimensions belong to a small object intended to be looked at, rather than to a full-size chair intended to hold a person.3

A model makes the outline easy to grasp as a whole. The actual chair asks the viewer to consider reach, weight and the space a reclining body would occupy. Each scale reveals something the other can conceal.

Return to the row of knobs. Once their job is understood, they cease to be an odd fringe of ornament. The chair begins to describe its own movement, even while standing completely still.

Research notesEvidence, connections and limits

The Cologne photograph shows one museum example. The Leopold and MoMA records describe their own chairs; the MAK record cited here is a small model, not a full-size chair or a source for seating dimensions.

Evidence map

Connected subjects and evidence

Reviewed connections

  • Sitzmaschine, model 670designed byJosef Hoffmanndocumented

    Circa1905 design.

    Reviewed 11 September 2026 by PatinaHall editorial.
  • Sitzmaschine, model 670manufactured byJacob & Josef Kohndocumented

    Museum names the Vienna manufacturer.

    Reviewed 11 September 2026 by PatinaHall editorial.

Research trail

Sources and further reading

  1. Sitzmaschine, model670, 361.1993Museum of Modern ArtAccessed 11 September 2026
  2. Liegefauteuil Modell670Leopold MuseumAccessed 11 September 2026
  3. Sitzmaschine model, H3422MAK ViennaAccessed 11 September 2026
  4. Sitzmaschine Cologne — image recordDaderot / Wikimedia CommonsAccessed 11 September 2026

Last reviewed 11 September 2026. Found an error or a stronger primary source? Contact PatinaHall.