Design story

Blow: building an armchair with air

Let the air out of Blow and most of what looked like a chair disappears. Its volume depends on pressure inside a flexible PVC skin. The 1967 design makes an ordinary armchair seem provisional: a substantial place to sit that can return to something much smaller and less definite.

A clear inflatable armchair has rounded air-filled arms and back surrounding a separate inflated seat cushion.
PatinaHall editorial reconstruction. It is not a documentary photograph. The transparent envelope makes an air-supported seat legible. This imagined chair is not the V&A object or a record of its condition.
On this page
Key facts & takeaways

At a glance

Subject
Blow armchair
Entry
Design story
Last reviewed
11 September 2026

Three things to remember

  1. Blow uses air inside PVC, rather than expanding polyurethane foam.
  2. The surrounding body and seat cushion are separate inflated parts.
  3. Carla Scolari belongs in the shared design credit.

A familiar shape with unfamiliar substance

Blow remains recognisable as an armchair. It has a back, two arms and a place to sit. What changes is the material doing the work between those boundaries.

MoMA records the design as PVC, made by Zanotta in 1967. Without air, the material is pliant; inflated, it takes on a much more substantial form. The familiar outline helps make that transformation easy to understand.1

Transparency adds another surprise. We can see the room through the chair, yet the swollen surfaces occupy real space. The object appears both present and temporary, like something that might be packed away when the gathering is over.

The seams draw the chair

The envelope cannot simply become any shape it likes. Joined edges define the chambers and constrain their expansion. A seam is therefore part of the structure as well as a visible line.

The V&A’s 1996 conservation study describes a valve in the surrounding body and a separate valve for the seat cushion. It also records supporting membranes around the seat arrangement. These details make the apparent simplicity more convincing: the chair contains distinct parts with distinct jobs.4

In a transparent object, such features are difficult to hide. They become part of its appearance. Instead of looking for a concealed timber frame, the eye follows the places where the flexible skin is joined and held.

An elongated air-filled volume appears above a separate smaller seat volume.
Original PatinaHall schematic, not to scale: the surrounding body and seat make distinct inflated parts. These separated symbols explain the form without reproducing seams or valves.

Put the whole team back in the picture

Blow is associated with the studio of Jonathan De Pas, Donato D’Urbino and Paolo Lomazzi. Some familiar collection credits stop at those three names. LACMA’s record also identifies Carla Scolari; Zanotta’s own history credits the trio with Scolari.3

Keeping her name in the story is a simple improvement to the usual shorthand. A compact object label can make a collaborative design look more settled and complete than the record actually is.

Zanotta’s account also places Blow among further pneumatic experiments following its success at the 1968 furniture fair, including a transparent inflatable pavilion. The chair belonged to a larger curiosity about light, temporary structures.2

Air carries a different expectation

A heavy wooden armchair promises permanence before anyone sits in it. Blow begins a different conversation. Its valves and swollen transparent surfaces make the dependence on air obvious.

That does not make it immaterial. The PVC, seams and supporting membranes remain essential. They are the parts that allow pressure to become furniture rather than just an inflated bag.

Look at Blow with the air in mind and its playful appearance becomes technically interesting. The empty space inside is doing a job normally entrusted to solid material. The chair’s most abundant ingredient is also the one we cannot see.

Research notesEvidence, connections and limits

Authorship is reconciled across museum and manufacturer records: MoMA names three designers, while LACMA includes Carla Scolari and Zanotta credits the group with Scolari. The 1996 conservation account describes a particular V&A example.

Evidence map

Connected subjects and evidence

Reviewed connections

  • Blow armchairdesigned byJonathan De Pasdocumented

    Credit checked against the institutional record and manufacturer.

    Reviewed 11 September 2026 by PatinaHall editorial.
  • Blow armchairdesigned byDonato D’Urbinodocumented

    Joint design.

    Reviewed 11 September 2026 by PatinaHall editorial.
  • Blow armchairdesigned byPaolo Lomazzidocumented

    Joint design.

    Reviewed 11 September 2026 by PatinaHall editorial.
  • Blow armchairdesigned byCarla Scolaridocumented

    LACMA identifies Carla Scolari, preserved despite omission in MoMA’s record.

    Reviewed 11 September 2026 by PatinaHall editorial.

Research trail

Sources and further reading

  1. Blow Inflatable Armchair, 473.1972.1Museum of Modern ArtAccessed 11 September 2026
  2. Icone del Design: BlowZanottaAccessed 11 September 2026
  3. Blow Inflatable ArmchairLos Angeles County Museum of ArtAccessed 11 September 2026
  4. Two Pooped-Out Pop Chairs, pp.10–12V&A Conservation Journal 21 / Roger GriffithAccessed 11 September 2026

Last reviewed 11 September 2026. Found an error or a stronger primary source? Contact PatinaHall.